blank'/>

Astrophotography banner

Saturday, August 22, 2026

Green Airglow Through Thin Clouds – Swain, New York

Green airglow visible through thin atmospheric clouds near Swain, New York
Green airglow shining through thin atmospheric clouds in the night sky near Swain, New York on August 15, 2026. Canon EOS Ra, EF 16–35mm f/2.8L II at 16 mm, f/2.8, ISO 40000, 25 seconds.

On the night of August 15, 2026, near Swain in western New York, I was photographing the night sky with my Canon EOS Ra. The sky was dark enough that a noticeable green color from atmospheric airglow was visible across much of the photograph.

What caught my attention was not only the green sky, but also the thin atmospheric clouds crossing parts of the frame. Stars remain clearly visible through them, showing that these clouds were optically thin.

Most of the thin clouds lie outside the brightest part of the Milky Way and appear greenish against the strong green airglow background. Small portions that cross the Milky Way appear somewhat warmer or more reddish. The effect is subtle, but it raises an interesting question: why can thin clouds appear green at night?

Green Airglow High Above the Clouds

The green night airglow is produced mainly by atomic oxygen emitting at a wavelength of 557.7 nm. The strongest part of this emission comes from Earth's upper atmosphere at roughly 90–100 km altitude, far above ordinary weather and tropospheric clouds.

The atmospheric clouds in these photographs are much lower. Because they are thin enough for stars to remain clearly visible, a significant part of the green airglow coming from above and behind them can simply pass through the cloud layer.

The clouds can also scatter some of the surrounding light. However, scattering by cloud droplets and ice crystals is different from the Rayleigh scattering by molecules that makes the daytime sky blue. Cloud particles are much larger and their scattering is considerably less selective by wavelength, so a thin cloud can retain much of the color of the illumination and sky background around it.

Different from Light-Polluted Clouds

This appearance is very different from the clouds we commonly see near cities. Under a light-polluted sky, clouds can become white, yellow, or orange because they reflect artificial light coming upward from the ground. Thick clouds may become much brighter than the clear sky, while stars behind them disappear completely.

Here the situation is almost the opposite. The clouds are faint and transparent, stars remain visible through them, and much of the observed color appears to come from the natural night-sky background rather than from strong artificial illumination below.

There is another subtle detail in the main photograph. Where the background sky is dominated by green airglow, the transparent clouds appear greenish. Near some of the more reddish regions of the Milky Way, their color also seems to shift slightly toward warmer tones.

The Canon EOS Ra has enhanced sensitivity to red astronomical emission, particularly around the H-alpha wavelength at 656.3 nm, so reddish emission regions along the Milky Way can be recorded more strongly than with a standard digital camera.

Why This Effect Is Easy to Overlook

Greenish atmospheric clouds are not necessarily rare in night-sky photographs, but the effect is easy to overlook. In many astrophotographs the green color is simply described as airglow, while the clouds themselves are treated as an unrelated foreground or atmospheric feature.

The important distinction is that the clouds are not producing airglow. The green emission originates much higher in Earth's atmosphere, while ordinary weather clouds are far below it. When those clouds are optically thin, part of the green airglow remains visible through them, and the cloud-covered part of the sky can therefore appear greenish in the photograph.

This can easily be confused with several other effects: light pollution reflected from clouds, aurora, camera white-balance shifts, or simply aggressive color processing. The most useful clue is that stars remain visible through the clouds, showing that the cloud layer is transparent enough for the background sky emission to pass through.

For this reason, I think the effect is probably photographed more often than it is discussed. What makes this Swain observation especially useful is the combination of strong green airglow, a dark sky and thin atmospheric clouds, which makes the relationship between the airglow and the cloud color easier to see.

The Effect Was Visible Even in a 2.4-Second Exposure

Green airglow visible through thin atmospheric clouds in a 2.4-second exposure near Swain, New York
A 2.4-second exposure showing green airglow and thin transparent atmospheric clouds with stars visible through them near Swain, New York on August 15, 2026.

Earlier that night, I took this 2.4-second exposure. Despite the very short exposure time, the green background and greenish transparent clouds are already visible, although the Milky Way and faint cloud structure are less detailed than in the 25-second photograph.

I find this short exposure especially interesting because it shows that the green airglow was strong enough to be recorded in only 2.4 seconds. The later 25-second exposure collected much more light and reveals the airglow, Milky Way and thin cloud structure in considerably greater detail.

A Similar Example from Colorado

A very interesting comparison was photographed by Aaron Watson of Skies-Alive Photography near Paonia, Colorado, on May 21, 2025. His photograph, Emerald Green Airglow with Orange Clouds, shows strong green airglow together with clearly visible atmospheric clouds.

The photograph is especially useful for comparison because the clouds near the horizon are orange from artificial skyglow, while the atmosphere behind and above them shows strong green airglow. It demonstrates that airglow can still be visible even when some light pollution is present near the horizon.

My Swain photographs show a different case. The atmospheric clouds are much thinner and more transparent, with stars clearly visible through them. Most of these clouds appear greenish where they are seen against the green airglow background, while small portions crossing the more reddish Milky Way show slightly warmer tones.

Together, the two observations show that the appearance of nighttime clouds depends not only on the clouds themselves, but also on the light coming from different directions. Artificial light from below can make clouds orange or yellow, while natural airglow high above them can create a green background that remains visible through sufficiently thin clouds.

Airglow Is Not Aurora

A green night sky can easily be mistaken for aurora in photographs, but airglow is a different phenomenon. Aurora is produced mainly when energetic charged particles interact with Earth's upper atmosphere and is strongly connected with geomagnetic activity. Airglow, on the other hand, is present even during quiet geomagnetic conditions and is continuously produced by chemical and physical processes in the upper atmosphere.

The intensity of airglow can vary considerably from night to night and across different parts of the sky. Atmospheric tides, gravity waves, changes in temperature and density, and changes in the distribution of atomic oxygen around the mesopause can all affect the brightness and structure of the green 557.7 nm emission.

This is an important reminder that a genuinely dark night sky is not necessarily black. Under good conditions, a camera can reveal green, reddish and other faint emissions produced by Earth's own atmosphere.

Photography Settings

Main photograph:
Camera: Canon EOS Ra
Lens: Canon EF 16–35mm f/2.8L II USM
Focal length: 16 mm
Aperture: f/2.8
ISO: 40000
Exposure: 25 seconds
Date: August 15, 2026
Location: Near Swain, New York

Short test photograph:
Camera: Canon EOS Ra
Lens: Canon EF 16–35mm f/2.8L II USM
Exposure: 2.4 seconds
Date: August 15, 2026
Location: Near Swain, New York

A Dark Sky Reveals Its Own Color

The area near Swain has a very good dark sky for New York State. According to the Light Pollution Map, this location is approximately between Bortle Classes 3 and 4. However, light-pollution maps should be considered an estimate rather than an exact measurement of what an observer will experience on a particular night. Actual sky quality also depends on atmospheric transparency, humidity, aerosols, nearby lights, the time of night and even the surrounding terrain.

Local geography can sometimes create a significantly darker pocket than a large-scale map might suggest. I experienced a good example at Sand Beach in Acadia National Park, Maine. The beach is only about 290 yards long, but the combination of a dark open-ocean horizon and surrounding mountains that shield light from populated areas creates an unusually dark observing location. Only a few miles away, where that terrain shielding disappears, light pollution becomes more noticeable.

One of my own practical indicators of an excellent astrophotography sky is visible airglow. In the original Bortle scale, readily apparent airglow is one of the characteristics of a Class 1 sky. A camera, however, is much more sensitive than the human eye and can record airglow under skies that would not visually qualify as Bortle Class 1.

The strong green airglow near the zenith in these Swain photographs can therefore have several explanations working together. The site was genuinely dark, photo at ISO 40000 was sensitive enough to reveal very faint atmospheric emission, and the green airglow itself may simply have been stronger than average that night because airglow intensity naturally changes with conditions in the upper atmosphere.

For me, this is one reason airglow is such an interesting practical indicator of sky quality. A light-pollution map provides a useful prediction, but the photograph records what the sky was actually doing at that location and at that moment. When natural green or reddish atmospheric emission becomes clearly visible instead of being overwhelmed by artificial skyglow, I know I am photographing under a genuinely good dark sky.

These photographs also show why atmospheric clouds at night do not always have to be white, gray or black. Under a dark sky, a thin transparent cloud can reveal some of the color of the natural sky behind it. On this night near Swain, that color was unmistakably green.

Related Astrophotography Posts

Thursday, August 20, 2026

Meteor over the Milky Way – Swain, New York

Meteor streak over the Milky Way photographed near Swain, New York on August 15, 2026
Cropped view showing a faint meteor crossing the Milky Way during a 308.6-second exposure near Swain, New York on August 15, 2026.

On the night of August 15, 2026, near Swain, New York, I was photographing the Milky Way with my Canon EOS Ra. During one long exposure, my wife and I saw a meteor cross the sky. It was not especially bright, but later I found what appears to be the same meteor recorded in the photograph.

I have watched Perseid meteors before, and even visually this one did not particularly look like a bright, typical Perseid to me. My first impression was that it could be a sporadic meteor. However, August 15 is still within the active period of the Perseid meteor shower, so I wanted to investigate whether it could have been a Perseid — and, perhaps even more importantly today, whether the streak could instead have been a satellite.

Meteor, Perseid or Satellite?

The meteor moved approximately from the upper-left toward the lower-right in the photograph. This is generally the correct direction for an object moving away from the Perseid radiant, which was located toward Perseus on the northeastern side of the sky.

The full photograph contains enough recognizable stars to check the orientation of the camera. The Milky Way crosses the frame, the Summer Triangle is prominent, and Beta Cassiopeiae (Caph) can also be identified toward the left side of the Milky Way.

When the meteor trail is extended backward across the sky, however, it does not line up perfectly with the expected Perseid radiant for August 15. Because this is a wide-angle photograph and the radiant is well outside the frame, simply extending a straight line on the image is only an approximation. Nevertheless, the difference is large enough that I would not confidently identify this meteor as a Perseid.

For now, my preferred interpretation is therefore simple: it is most likely a meteor, and probably a sporadic meteor rather than a Perseid.

Wide-angle view of the Milky Way and Summer Triangle with a faint meteor near Swain, New York
Full-frame 16 mm view showing the Milky Way, Summer Triangle and a faint meteor near Swain, New York on August 15, 2026. Canon EOS Ra, 308.6 seconds, f/2.8, ISO 1600.

Could It Be a Satellite?

With a five-minute exposure, a satellite has to be considered. A satellite normally produces a long straight trail, and a satellite that slowly flares and fades can sometimes look surprisingly similar to a meteor in a single photograph.

I checked available catalogued satellite trajectories for the location and corrected exposure time. There were satellites in this general region of the sky, but I did not find a convincing illuminated satellite that followed the photographed trail at the correct time and in the correct direction. One geometrically interesting satellite candidate was already inside Earth's shadow and therefore should not have been visible by reflected sunlight.

This does not provide absolute proof — very faint satellites and some orbital debris can always make identification difficult — but together with the fact that two of us actually watched the meteor at the time of the exposure, a meteor is by far the more natural explanation.

Photography Settings

Camera: Canon EOS Ra
Lens: Canon EF 16–35mm f/2.8L II USM
Focal length: 16 mm
Aperture: f/2.8
ISO: 1600
Exposure: 308.6 seconds
Date: August 15, 2026
Location: Near Swain, New York

Finding the Exact Time

For checking satellites, the exact exposure time is important. I had photographed my computer clock during the same session and later discovered that the camera clock was approximately 8 minutes 1 second fast.

The meteor image has a camera timestamp of 11:39:19 PM. I also tested my Canon EOS Ra afterward and confirmed that the time stored with a photograph corresponds to the beginning of the exposure, not the end.

After correcting the camera clock, this exposure therefore began at approximately 11:31:18 PM EDT and continued for about 5 minutes 9 seconds, ending near 11:36:27 PM.

I later synchronized the Canon EOS Ra clock with my computer using Canon EOS Utility. This is a very useful setting for astrophotography, especially for meteors, eclipses, satellite identification, or any observation where the exact time matters. It is also important to check the camera's Daylight Saving Time setting; for New York in summer the DST setting should be enabled.

Meteor Photography in the Age of Satellites

There is also something a little frustrating about photographing meteors today. Twenty years ago, when a short unexpected streak appeared in an astrophotograph, a meteor was often the obvious first possibility. Satellites existed, of course, but there were far fewer of them crossing every part of the night sky.

Today the situation is very different. A long exposure can contain one or several satellite trails, and even a short fading streak has to be investigated before calling it a meteor. Sometimes it feels as if photographing a meteor is no longer only about being lucky enough to catch one — afterward you also have to prove that it was not a satellite.

In this case, fortunately, there was something the camera metadata and satellite catalog could not provide: my wife and I were standing under the sky and actually saw the meteor ourselves.

Dark Sky, Airglow and Dew

The area near Swain, in western New York near the Finger Lakes region, has a very good dark sky for New York State. According to the Light Pollution Map, this location is approximately between Bortle Classes 3 and 4. One of my own simple indicators of a genuinely dark sky is visible airglow. Under a dark enough sky, especially in long-exposure photographs, the background is often not black at all but can show green or sometimes reddish emission from Earth's upper atmosphere. The noticeable green airglow close to the zenith in this photograph was another indication of how dark and transparent the sky was that night.

There is also one practical challenge when photographing at night in this area: dew can become very strong. During a long astrophotography session the front lens element can gradually fog, even when the sky looks perfectly clear. An anti-dew heater around the lens is highly recommended for long exposures and overnight photography here.

Related Astrophotography Posts

Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Partial Solar Eclipse in New York City – August 12, 2026

Maximum partial solar eclipse visible from New York City on August 12, 2026, with sunspot groups AR4508, AR4507 and AR4503
Maximum partial solar eclipse visible from New York City – August 12, 2026. About 9% of the Sun was covered by the Moon.

On August 12, 2026, a total solar eclipse crossed parts of Greenland, Iceland, Spain, and a small part of Portugal. New York City was far outside the path of totality, but we still had a chance to see a partial solar eclipse, with about 9% of the Sun covered by the Moon at maximum eclipse.

I photographed the eclipse from New York City using a Canon EOS Ra with a Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM lens and Canon Extender EF 2x III, giving an effective focal length of 400mm. A Thousand Oaks 72-T threaded solar filter was used for all photographs.

For all photographs I kept the aperture fixed at f/8 for consistent sharpness, while varying the shutter speed and ISO to find the best exposure for showing the solar surface and sunspots. Because of these different exposure settings, the apparent color of the solar disk varies slightly between the images, from a deeper reddish-orange to a lighter, almost white appearance. In the darker, more reddish exposures, the contrast of the sunspots is generally stronger and they are easier to see.

The image above shows the maximum partial eclipse visible from New York City. The photographs below show the eclipse in chronological order, beginning when the Moon first started moving across the edge of the Sun.

Several groups of sunspots are also visible in the photographs. I identified three of them as AR4508, AR4507, and AR4503 using the solar images and active-region labels published by SpaceWeather.com. The active region AR4506 was also present on the Sun but was not clearly visible in my photographs.

Beginning of the Solar Eclipse

Beginning of the partial solar eclipse in New York City on August 12, 2026, with visible sunspots
Canon EOS Ra, Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM + Canon Extender EF 2x III (400mm), f/8, 1/640 sec, ISO 3200

This photograph was taken just a few minutes after the partial eclipse began at about 1:07 p.m. EDT. The Moon had just started moving onto the solar disk. Sunspot groups AR4508, AR4507, and AR4503 are visible across the Sun.

Partial Solar Eclipse over New York City

Partial solar eclipse over New York City on August 12, 2026, photographed with a Canon EOS Ra at 400mm
Canon EOS Ra, 400mm, f/8, 1/160 sec, ISO 320

The Moon moves farther across the edge of the Sun while the three sunspot groups remain clearly visible.

Solar Eclipse Progression

Progression of the August 12, 2026 partial solar eclipse in New York City with visible sunspot groups
Canon EOS Ra, 400mm, f/8, 1/160 sec, ISO 400.

As the eclipse progresses, the curved dark edge of the Moon becomes more pronounced against the bright solar disk.

Partial Solar Eclipse Near Maximum

Partial solar eclipse in New York City on August 12, 2026, near maximum eclipse
Canon EOS Ra, 400mm, f/8, 1/160 sec, ISO 200.

This photograph was taken later in the eclipse, when the Moon had moved farther across the solar disk and the eclipse was getting close to its maximum as seen from New York City.

Maximum Partial Solar Eclipse in NYC

The first image at the top of this post shows the maximum eclipse visible from New York City. Maximum eclipse occurred at about 1:54 p.m. EDT, when approximately 9% of the Sun was covered by the Moon. The photograph was taken with a Canon EOS Ra at 400mm, f/8, 1/160 sec and ISO 500.

Although this was very different from the spectacular total solar eclipse seen along the path of totality in Greenland, Iceland, and Spain, it was still an amazing astronomical event to observe and photograph from New York City.

The combination of the Moon's silhouette and several groups of sunspots made this relatively small partial eclipse especially interesting through a 400mm telephoto lens.

What a Simple Eclipse Photo Can Show

Looking more carefully at the photographs led to another interesting question. The visible sunspot groups provide reference points on the solar disk and allow us to roughly reconstruct the orientation of the Sun's equatorial region and rotation axis. The curved limb of the Moon then gives another direction in the same image.

Annotated August 12, 2026 NYC solar eclipse showing the approximate solar equator, Sun's rotation axis, lunar limb orientation, and sunspot groups AR4508, AR4507 and AR4503
Geometry of the August 12, 2026 partial solar eclipse from New York City. The annotation shows the approximate solar equator and rotation axis, the orientation of the Moon's limb, and visible sunspot groups AR4508, AR4507 and AR4503. The lines are approximate and intended to illustrate how eclipse photography can reveal the geometry of the Sun-Earth-Moon system.

At first this looks like simple geometry, but it quickly leads to much deeper astronomy. The orientation of the Moon during an eclipse depends on the tilt of the Sun's rotation axis, the inclination of the Moon's orbit, the geometry of the Earth-Moon-Sun system, and our position on the rotating Earth. Topocentric parallax also matters: it is not only the apparent displacement of the nearby Moon, but the way that displacement changes as the observer moves with Earth's rotation that modifies the Moon's apparent path across the Sun.

The annotated image below shows the approximate solar equator, solar rotation axis, visible sunspot groups, and orientation of the lunar limb. These lines should be considered an illustration rather than a precision measurement, but they show how much information can be hidden in a seemingly simple eclipse photograph.

This is one of the things I enjoy most about astrophotography. A photograph can begin simply as a record of what was visible in the sky, but looking at it more closely can lead to questions about the Sun's rotation, the Moon's orbit, parallax, Earth's rotation, and the three-dimensional geometry of a solar eclipse. Sometimes a simple photograph is only the starting point for going much deeper into astronomy.

Related Solar Eclipse Astrophotography Posts